Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1993 REVIEW DENIED Damage that resulted from an attorney's malpractice consists of the difference between what the client actually received and what the client should have received had the case been handled properly.CitationLOUBE v LOUBE (Shouldagot) 64 CA4 421 [See: Mosier v SCPIE 63 CA4 1022, T/AT 6/98; Arciniega v Bank 52 CA4 213, T/AT 2/97; Mattco v Arthur Young 52 CA4 820, T/AT 3/97; Xuereb v Marcus 3 CA4 1338] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||