|
2043 REVIEW DENIED Unless the government has actually interfered with use and enjoyment of the realty, a plaintiff suing for inverse condemnation based on pre-condemnation government acts is not entitled to compensation for expenses incurred in purchasing another property for the purpose of relocating to mitigate anticipated loss of business good will.CitationBARTHELEMY v OC CTY FLOOD CONTROL (Anticipated Loss) 65 CA4 558 [See: CA Const I, 19; CCP 1263.510; Klopping v City 8 C3 39; Peo ex rel DOT v Muller 36 C3 263; Chhour v Community Redevelopment 46 CA4 273, T/AT 7/96]
|
|
