Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1967 Since a motion for a writ of sale is part of the proceeding that led to the judgment that the motion seeks to enforce and is not a separate proceeding, it may not be the basis of a subsequent action for malicious prosecution.CitationMERLET v RIZZO (Writ of Sale) 64 CA4 53 [See: Sheldon Appel v Albert & Oliker 47 C3 863; Imig v Ferrar 70 CA3 48; Pace v Hillcrest 101 CA3 476; Coleman v Gulf 41 C3 782; Stolz v Wong 25 CA4 1811, T/AT 7/94; Merron v Title Guar 27 CA2 119] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||