|
p0454 REVIEW GRANTED A City of Oakland municipal ordinance regulating certain loans secured by realty within the city did not conflict with state law because it did not mandate what state law expressly forbids or forbid what state law expressly mandates.CitationAMERICAN FINANCIAL v CITY OF OAKLAND (Loan Ordinance) 111 Cal.app.4th 1435 [See: CA Const Art XI, 7, 5; CivC 1916.12; SherwinWilliams v City of LA 4 C4 893; Horton v City of Oakland 82 Cal.app.4th 580; Great Western v County of LA 27 C4 853]
|
|
