Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0440 Equitable estoppel prevents a party who seeks to receive benefits under a contract from asserting its status as a non-signatory in an attempt to evade the arbitration provisions of the same contract.CitationMETALCLAD v VENTANA (Arbitration Estoppel) 109 CA4 1705 [See: NORCAL v Newton 84 CA4 64; Sunkist v Sunkist Growers 10 F3 753] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||