|
p0437 REVIEW GRANTED There was an ambiguity in an insurance policy that contained a clause in which the carrier agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of a court of competent jurisdiction and another clause saying that notwithstanding any other item in the policy the parties agree to submit all disputes to binding arbitration, and since the contract was one of adhesion, the ambiguity should be resolved against the insurer, who prepared itCitationBOGHOS v LLOYD'S (Conflicting Clauses) 109 CA4 1728 [See: Moses H. Cone Hosp v Mercury 460 US 1; Ericksen, Arbuthnot v 100 Oak St 35 C3 312; Victoria v SuperCt 40 C3 734; Badie v B of A 67 CA4 779, T/AT 12/98]
|
|
