|
3574 An employee's claim that his employer induced him to accept employment by promising to train him and subsequently misrepresented the terms of a collective bargaining agreement to justify its failure to provide the promised training required interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement and was therefore pre-empted by the federal Labor Management Relations (Taft-Hartley) Act of 1947, even though the employee was not a member of the union and not a party to the collective bargaining agreement.CitationLEVY v SKYWALKER SOUND (Sound Mixer) 108 CA4 753 [See: LabC 204, 222, 223, 970; 29 USC 185; Lazar v Superior Court 12 C4 631, T/AT 2/96]
|
|
