|
3681 Parents who experienced emotional distress upon learning about a sexual relationship between their minor daughter and a high school teacher were not entitled to recover from the school district as bystanders because they were not aware of the relationship as it occurred, and were not entitled to recover as direct victims, because the district's alleged negligent failure to supervise the teacher was not directed at them; the school district was not negligent in employing the teacher because it had no reason to know of his pedophile tendencies or of the relationship between him and the girl.CitationSTEVEN F v ANAHEIM UHSD (Molested Student's Parents) 112 CA4 904 [See: Thing v LaChusa 48 C3 644; Molien v Kaiser 27 C3 916; Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108]
|
|
