|
p0351 REVIEW DENIED In a suit against an insurance carrier based on the claim that it miscomputed the dates of losses resulting from the Northridge earthquake to avoid paying legitimate claims, common questions did not predominate and class certification would have been improper because there were many questions of fact about the value of each class member's damage and whether it was caused by the earthquake.CitationBASURCO v 21ST CENTURY INS (Earthquake Class) 108 CA4 110 [See: CCP 340.9; City of SJ v Superior Court 12 C3 447; Washington Mut v Superior Court 24 C4 906]
|
|
