Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3547 REVIEW DENIED Advertising statements about a particular commercial product are not protected by the antiSLAPP statute unless the product truly is a matter of genuine public interest.CitationCONSUMER JUSTICE CTR v TRIMEDICA (Breast Enlargement) 107 CA4 595 [See: CCP 425.16; CivC 1770; B&PC 17200, etseq; Briggs v Eden Council 19 C4 1106, T/AT 2/99; DuPont v Superior Court 78 CA4 562, T/AT 3/00] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||