- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
p0386 A party appearing in pro per does not receive preferential consideration and is held to the same restrictive rules of procedure as an attorney, so an appeal purportedly taken by a party appearing in pro per from a clerk's entry of default or an order denying a motion to set aside the clerk's entry of default was dismissedCitationFIRST AMERICAN TITLE v MIRZAIAN (Pro Per Appeal) 108 CA4 956 [See: Barton v New United 43 CA4 1200, T/AT 5/96; Winter v Rice 176 CA3 679; Bianco v CHP 24 CA4 1113] |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||