- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
3481 An employee who became lightheaded as a result of inhaling pesticide fumes at work and who went home early as a result was within the scope of employment when her condition caused her to injure plaintiff, so the employer can be vicariously liable on a theory of respondeat superior.CitationBUSSARD v MINIMED (Lightheaded Employee) 105 CA4 798 [See: Childers v Shasta 190 CA3 792; Farmers v County 11 C4 992, T/AT 1/96] |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||