|
p0427 REVIEW DENIED Settlement of an insured's claim against its workers' compensation insurer based on the assertion that the insurer had damaged the insured by incorrectly reporting certain claim information did not preclude, on the ground of mootness, a court's consideration of the insured's petition for a writ of administrative mandate setting aside an adverse ruling of the Insurance Department, because issuance of the writ could result in requiring the insurer to correct its reports, which could have a bearing on future premiums.CitationSIMI v GARAMENDI (Mootness) 109 CA4 1496 [See: InsC 11734, 11751.5, 11736; Downtown Palo Alto v City Council 180 CA3 384]
|
|
