Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3533 REVIEW DENIED Although it knew that a diagnostic test would be used on a prospective employee who was an ethical vegan, the test manufacturer owed the prospective employee no duty of care when informing the prospective employer that the test did not make use of animal products.CitationFRIEDMAN v MERCK (Ethical Vegan) 107 CA4 454 [See: Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108; Branch v Homefed 6 CA4 793; Bily v Arthur Young 3 C4 370, T/AT 11/92] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||