|
3479 Under an immunity statute contained in the Education Code, a school district that advertised, promoted, recruited, encouraged and convinced a student and his parents to participate in a summer camp program, provided them with applications, helped fill them out, assured them that the camp was safe, and transported the student from home to the school where the camp bus picked him up for transportation to the camp did not thereby become responsible for injuries sustained by the student as a result of negligence by the camp or camp employees.CitationRAMIREZ v LONG BEACH USD (Summer Camp) 105 CA4 182 [See: EdC 44808; Rodriguez v Inglewood USD 186 CA3 707; Hoff v Vacaville USD 19 C4 925, T/AT 2/99; Wolfe v Dublin USD 56 CA4 126, T/AT 8/97, Myricks v Lynwood USD 74 CA4 231, T/AT 9/99]
|
|
