3543 REVIEW DENIED A plaintiff suing his/her former attorney for breach of contract seeking to recover for attorney fees plaintiff had to pay in an attempt correct errors allegedly made by the former attorney is not required to prove that s/he would have received a better settlement or judgment (i.e., a case within a case) without the alleged negligence.CitationORRICK, HERRINGTON ... v SUPERIOR COURT (Case Within A Case) 107 CA4 1052 [See: Marshak v Ballesteros 72 CA4 1514, T/AT 7/99; CSAA v Parichan 84 CA4 702, T/AT 12/00; Thompson v Halvonik 36 CA4 657, T/AT 8/95, Viner v Sweet (RevGrtd) 92 CA4 730, T/AT 11/01]
|
|