Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3515 Expert testimony that plaintiff needed surgery to correct a back problem and might have to undergo a second surgery depending on the outcome of the first was not sufficient to justify the award of future damages connected with a second surgery; damages for future lost earnings should be reduced to current value.CitationSCOGNAMILLO v HERRICK (Future Damages) 106 CA4 1639 [See: CivC 3283; BAJI 14.60; Niles v City 42 CA3 230; Bellman v SF HS Dist 11 C2 576] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||