Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0375 REVIEW DENIED An action is not subject to a motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute unless it arose from defendant's exercise of one of the constitutional rights enumerated in the statute, even if it was triggered by such an exercise.CitationSANTA MONICA RENT CONTROL BOARD v PEARL STREET (Rent Control SLAPP) 109 CA4 1308 [See: CCP 425.16; Equilon v Consumer Cause 29 C4 53, T/AT 10/02; Cotati v Cashman 29 C4 69, T/AT 10/02; Gallimore v State Farm 102 CA4 1388 T/AT 11/02] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||