Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3645 REVIEW DENIED Although failure to inspect premises for an unreasonable length of time may justify the inference that a dangerous condition existed long enough for the operator of the premises to have notice of its existence, notice is a question of fact and a jury should be instructed that it is necessary to a finding of negligence.CitationMOORE v WAL-MART (French Fry Flop) 111 CA4 472 [See: Ortega v KMart 26 C4 1200, T/AT 2/02] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||