|
3707 A supervisory employee of a company with a policy prohibiting intimate relationships between supervisors and subordinates had no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding his intimate relationship with a subordinate and therefore could not make out an action for invasion of the right of privacy under the state Constitution against the employer after being terminated because of the intimate relationship.CitationBARBEE v HOUSEHOLD (Intimate Relationship) 113 CA4 525 [See: CA Const. I, 1; LabC 96; Hill v NCAA 7 C4 1; Lawrence v Texas 123 SCt 2472]
|
|
