|
3606 REVIEW DENIED An insurer was justified in refusing to defend its insured in a claim arising solely from allegations that the insured conspired to pervert and obstruct justice, to a criminal charge of which the insured had pleaded guilty; a claimant who stated in a deposition that her action against an insured was based entirely on his criminal acts was judicially estopped from later asserting that the action arose from acts that were not wilful or intentional.CitationUHRICH v STATE FARM (Guilty Plea) 109 CA4 598 [See: InsC 533; Downey Venture v LMI 66 CA4 478, T/AT 10/98]
|
|
