|
3551 Allegations that plaintiff's realty was damaged by a municipality's construction of an underground transit line, that the construction is ongoing, and that it will continue to damage the property were sufficient to allege a continuous and repeated course of conduct causing damage that has not stabilized, so statutes of limitations on private nuisance and on inverse condemnation did not bar or begin to run on the claims.CitationLEE v LA CTY MTA (Red Line) 107 CA4 848 [See: GovC 911.2, 900 etseq; CCP 338(j); Pierpont v State 70 C2 282; Stonewall v City of Palos Verdes 46 CA4 1810, T/AT 7/96]
|
|
