|
3695 REVIEW DENIED When additional insured endorsements depend on the existence of a written contract between the named insured and the additional insured, the contract is a significant circumstance that must be considered in determining the objectively reasonable expectations of the additional insured and interpreting the insurance policy, even if the insurer never saw the contract; if the contract between the named insured and the additional insured requires the named insured to indemnify the additional insured only for liability resulting from the negligence of the named insured, the additional insured is covered only for liability resulting from negligence of the named insured.CitationST PAUL MERCURY v FRONTIER (Additional Insured) 111 CA4 1234 [See: St Paul v American Dynasty 101 CA4 1038, T/AT 10/02; Bank of the West v Superior Court 2 C4 1254, T/AT 9/92; Acceptance v Syufy 69 CA4 321, T/AT 2/99]
|
|
