Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3529 Pre-emption of state claims by ERISA is limited to actions against plan fiduciaries regarding administrative decisions concerning plan benefits, so a claim that doctors paid by an ERISA plan refused to treat plaintiff because her sexual preference offended their religious beliefs is not pre-empted.CitationBENITEZ v NORTHCOAST WOMEN'S CARE (ERISA Pre-emption) 106 CA4 978 [See: 29 USC 1144; NY Blue Cross v Travelers 514 US 645; Pegram v Herdrich 530 US 211] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||