|
3581 REVIEW GRANTED Widespread media publicity about the release of contaminants by defendant but not mentioning the cancer-causing properties of those contaminants may be sufficient to place plaintiffs on notice of a potential cause of action and trigger the running of the statute of limitations on their claims for illness resulting from exposure to the contaminants.CitationLOCKHEED v SUPERIOR COURT (Media Publicity) 109 CA4 24 [See: H&SC 25249.6; Jolly v Eli Lilly 44 C3 1103; Stutz v Reebok 909 FS 1353; United Klans v McGovern 621 F2 152]
|
