3545 REVIEW DENIED Liability for conspiracy cannot be imposed unless defendant owed plaintiff a duty that was violated by the conspiracy; in the absence of evidence of defendant's share of the national market the market share theory of liability can not be applied to a manufacturer of asbestos brakes.CitationFERRIS v GATKE (Market Share) 107 CA4 1211 [See: Sindell v Abbott 26 C3 588; Mullen v Armstrong 200 CA3 250; Wheeler v Raybestos Manhattan 8 CA4 1152, T/AT 10/92; Rutherford v Owens 16 C4 953, T/AT 10/97; Chavers v Gatke 107 CA4 606, T/AT 5/03]
|
|