Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3610 REVIEW DENIED A defendant that rented its premises for a rave party and took reasonable steps to prevent the sale of drugs on the premises did not owe teenagers attending it a duty to prevent them from using drugs, leaving in a state of fatigue or intoxication, or driving while their abilities to do so were impaired.CitationSAKIYAMA v AMF (Rave Party) 110 CA4 398 [See: Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108; Weirum v RKO 15 C3 40] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||