Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0325 If for the convenience of all parties the hearing on an anti-SLAPP motion is held more than thirty days after the notice of motion was served, the motion should be denied as untimely, unless the moving party demonstrates that docket conditions of the court required a later hearing.CitationDECKER v UD REGISTRY (Late Hearing) 105 CA4 1382 [See: CCP 425.16, 128.5; Equilon v Consumer Cause 29 C4 53, T/AT 10/02] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||