|
3692 The right to conduct free speech activity in a small shopping mall must be balanced against the property rights of the mall operator and business operators in the mall; in this case the trial court made a proper determination when it issued a preliminary injunction against demonstrations directed at a strip club located in the mall.CitationSLAUSON PARTNERSHIP v OCHOA (Strip Club Protest) 112 CA4 1005 [See: CCP 425.16; Robins v Pruneyard 23 C3 899; Trader Joe's v Progressive 73 CA4 425 T/AT 8/99; Costco v Gallant 96 CA4 740, T/AT 4/02]
|
|
