Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2885 REVIEW DENIED The doctrine of comparative fault does not apply to a claim for intentional tort.CitationHEINER v KMART (Store Battery) 84 CA4 335 [See: Bartosh v Banning 251 CA2 378; Li v Yellow Cab 13 C3 804; American Motorcycle v Superior Court 20 C3 578; Allen v Sundean 137 CA3 216; Baird v Jones 21 CA4 684, T/AT 3/94] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||