|
2626 REVIEW DENIED An action on behalf of the general public for unfair business practices, based on the claim that a power company failed to replace regulators after receiving PUC approval for a rate increase based on its promise to replace regulators was not pre-empted on the ground that the PUC has exclusive jurisdiction over rate-making; however, under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, all judicial action was stayed pending determination by the PUC.CitationWISE v PG&E (Unreplaced Regulators) 77 CA4 287 [See: CA Const XII, 2,4,6; SDG&E v Superior Court 13 C4 893, T/AT 9/96; Waters v Pac Tel 12 C3 1]
|
|
