Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2596 In an action against the LA PD, evidence that during jury selection, prospective jurors concealed their bias against the LA PD and that during deliberations these same jurors talked extensively about personal experiences that led them to believe that the LA PD routinely falsified evidence and "screwed people over" was sufficient to require a new trial on the ground of juror misconduct.CitationENYART v CITY OF LOS ANGELES (RFK Shots) 76 CA4 499 [See: Weathers v Kaiser 5 C3 98] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||