|
2771 If a general contractor seeks indemnity from a subcontractor after settling a claim that made no allocation between defects caused by the subcontractor's work and defects that were not, the subcontractor is entitled to have a jury determine what part of the settlement should be allocated to defects that resulted from the subcontractor's work.CitationCOLLINS DEVELOPMENT v DJ PLASTERING (Stucco Defects) 81 CA4 771 [See: Culley v Superior Court 10 CA4 1484; Heppler v Peters 73 CA4 1265, T/AT 9/99; Gouvis v Superior Court 37 CA4 642, T/AT 9/95; CC-California v Paller 51 CA4 1042; Regan Roofing v Superior Court 21 CA4 1685, T/AT 3/94]
|
|
