2759 REVIEW DENIED No section of federal law pre-empts a state law cause of action, brought under California's unfair competition law, in which a brokerage firm is alleged to have violated its duty to customers by not executing their orders for stock sales in a fair and timely manner and instead "trading ahead" for its own benefit before processing those sales for its customers.CitationROSKIND v MORGAN STANLEY (Trading Ahead) 80 CA4 345 [See: B&PC 17200 etseq; 15 USC 78bb(a); Matsushita v Epstein 516 US 367; Diamond v Superior Court 19 C4 1036, T/AT 2/99; State Farm v Superior Court 45 CA4 1093, T/AT 6/96]
|
|