|
2650 REVIEW DENIED Under a CGL policy providing coverage for property damage caused by an occurrence and defining occurrence as "an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions," there was no coverage for damage resulting from bad advice the insured gave acting in the capacity of roofing consultant.CitationRAY v VALLEY FORGE (Roofing Consultant) 77 CA4 1039 [See: Collin v American Empire 21 CA4 787, T/AT 3/94; Shell v Winterthur 12 CA4 715, T/AT 3/93; Merced Mut v Mendez 213 CA3 41; St Paul Fire v Superior Court 161 CA3 1199]
|
|
