|
2793 Immunities provided by the Tort Claims Act do not insulate a public entity from liability for inverse condemnation; damage resulting from a public entity's plan to replace deteriorating pipes only as they fail is recoverable in inverse condemnation, without regard to whether the plan was unreasonable.CitationPACIFIC BELL v CITY OF SD (Failed Pipes) 81 CA4 596 [See: GovC 850.4; Barham v So Cal Edison 74 CA4 744, T/AT 10/99; Baldwin v State 6 C3 424; Holtz v Superior Court 3 C3 296; McMahan's v City of SM 146 CA3 683]
|
|
