|
2797 REVIEW DENIED There is no such thing as "unintentional child molestation," "negligent harassment," "negligent stalking" or "accidental intercourse," so a liability insurer had no obligation to defend an action based on allegations that the insured raped and stalked a fifteen-year-old girl, and which included claims for conduct characterized as negligent molestation, negligent harassment, negligent stalking, negligent intercourse, and negligent sexual touching.CitationNORTHLAND INS v BRIONES (Accidental Intercourse) 81 CA4 796 [See: InsC 533; Horace Mann v Barbara B 4 C4 1076, T/AT 5/93; Gray v Zurich 65 C2 263; Kleis v Superior Court 37 CA4 1035, T/AT 9/95; JC Penney v M K 52 C3 1009]
|
|
