|
2586 Under a theft policy that excluded property missing with no physical evidence to show what happened to it, a trial court properly could have concluded that evidence that a burglar alarm was tripped and the contents of an office were disturbed was not sufficient to trigger coverage when coupled with evidence that there was no sign of entry; no indication that property in the warehouse was disturbed, moved or taken; that other persons had legitimate access to the disturbed office; and that rodents had been causing false alarms.CitationBLASIAR v FIREMAN'S FUND (Mysterious Disappearance) 76 CA4 748 [See: Feurzeig v Ins Co 59 CA4 1276, T/AT 1/98; Waller v Truck Ins 11 C4 1, T/AT 10/95]
|
|
