|
2764 The doctrine of primary assumption of the risk barred an action based on conduct by defendant that did not increase the risk that a skateboarder would fall and sustain injury, but increased the severity of an injury so sustained; one who is not a purveyor of recreational activities has no obligation to avoid increasing the risk of a recreational activity in which plaintiff is participating; recreational land use immunity does not apply to an injury sustained by a person expressly invited onto the premises, even though that person was not invited for recreational purposes.CitationCALHOON v LEWIS (Skateboard) 81 CA4 108[See: CivC 846; Johnson v Unocal 21 CA4 310, T/AT 3/94; Ornelas v Randolph 4 C4 1095, T/AT 5/93; Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296, T/AT 10/92; Parsons v Crown 15 C4 456, T/AT 6/97; Connelly v Mammoth 39 CA4 8, T/AT 11/95]
|
|
