|
2690 A Mexican insurance company that, at the request of a California insurance broker, issued a policy insuring a Mexican manufacturer for shipments to and from Los Angeles, but that never had agents in California; never had an office or conducted business in California; never advertised or solicited business in California; never delivered an insurance policy in California; never mailed premium notices to or collected premiums in California; and that required its insureds to have a business address in Mexico, where notices and bills could be sent, did not have sufficient contacts with the state to permit California courts to exercise jurisdiction over it.CitationTRI-WEST v SEGUROS MONTERREY (Mexican Insurance) 78 CA4 672 [See: InsC 1610, 1611; CCP 410.10; In re Martin 207 CA3 1426; Int Shoe v Washington 326 US 310; Vons v Seabest 14 C4 434, T/AT 1/97]
|
|
