|
2748 [SEE #2525] The fact that state engineers concluded that a highway could be made safer by the construction of a median barrier did not establish notice that changed circumstances resulted in a dangerous condition of public property and did not result in loss of the state's design immunity.CitationALVAREZ v STATE (Median Barrier) 79 CA4 720 [See: GovC 830.6; Sutton v Golden Gate 68 CA4 1149, T/AT 2/99; Higgins v State 54 CA4 177, T/AT 5/97; Baldwin v State 6 C3 424; Dole v State 60 CA4 486, T/AT 2/98; Alvarez v State (WD) 75 CA4 903, T/AT 11/99]
|
|
