Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2624 A claim of inverse condemnation is not ripe if the plaintiffs cannot show that their development plan has been rejected under existing regulations or that it would be futile for them to apply for approval of the plan.CitationCALPROP v CITY OF SD (Unripe Regulation) 77 CA4 582 [See: MacDonald v Yolo Cty 477 US 340; Toigo v Town of Ross 70 CA4 309, T/AT 4/99; Milagra v City of Pacifica 62 CA4 108, T/AT 4/98; Mills v City of HB 75 CA4 249, T/AT 11/99] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||