Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2708 REVIEW DENIED A claim for interference with economic advantage based on the defendant's destruction of evidence needed by the plaintiff to make out a case against a third party is actually an action for negligent spoliation of evidence, which has been abolished in California.CitationFARMERS INS v SUPERIOR COURT (Negligent Spoliation) 79 CA4 1400 [See: Cedars-Sinai v Superior Court 18 C4 1, T/AT 6/98; Temple v Superior Court 20 C4 464, T/AT 7/99; J'Aire v Gregory 24 C3 799] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||