Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2640 The fact that a terminated employee was replaced by an older person does not establish, as a matter of law, that the termination was not motivated by age discrimination.CitationBEGNAL v CANFIELD (Older Replacement) 78 CA4 66 [See: GovC 12900 etseq; Caldwell v Paramount 41 CA4 189, T/AT 1/96; Hersant v CA Dept of Soc Svcs 57 CA4 997, T/AT 10/97; Wright v Southland 187 F3 1287; Greene v Safeway 98 F3 554; Heard v Lockheed 44 CA4 1735, T/AT 6/96] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||