|
2876 DEPUBLISHED Whether attorneys representing a corporation also represented corporate officers personally may be a question of fact; attorney malpractice results in actual injury when the client sustains the loss or diminution of a right or remedy as a result; litigation arising from a transaction is not a continuation of the transaction, so representation of the same client in the litigation is not a representation regarding the same specific subject matter such as to toll the statute of limitations on actions for malpractice in connection with the transaction. CitationRALLIS v CASSADY (Florida Litigation) 84 CA4 285 [See: CCP 340.6; ITT v Niles 9 C4 245, T/AT 2/95; Jordache v Brobeck 18 C4 739, T/AT 9/98; Fox v Pollack 181 CA3 954; Streit v Covington 82 CA4 441, T/AT 9/00; Del Webb v Structural 123 CA3 611; Kane v Altagen 107 CA3 36; Miller v Metzinger 91 CA3 31; Foxborough v Van Atta 26 CA4 217, T/AT 8/94; Beane v Paulsen 21 CA4 89, T/AT 2/94; Redman v Walters 88 CA3 448]
|
|
