|
2731 REVIEW DENIED The Boy Scouts of America organization has a duty to train and educate scouts, their parents, scouting employees, and scouting volunteers about how to identify and avoid the sexual abuse of scouts; unless an employer hires or retains an employee with reason to know that the employee has a propensity to molest children, the employer is not liable for negligent employment to a molested child; sexual molestation of a boy scout by a scouting employee is outside the scope of employment.CitationJUAREZ v BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA (Molesting Scoutmaster) 80 CA4 876 [See: Mary M v City of LA 54 C3 202; Lisa M v Henry Mayo 12 C4 291, T/AT 1/96; Evan F v Hughson 8 CA4 828, T/AT 10/92; RC Bishop v Superior Court 42 CA4 1556, T/AT 4/96; Chaney v Superior Court 39 CA4 152, T/AT 11/95; Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108]
|
|
