|
2727 Since the Labor Code requires an employer to reimburse an employee for moneys expended within the scope of employment, an attorney-employer has standing to appeal a sanction imposed on an attorney-employee; a court did not abuse its discretion by imposing an addition sanction for an attorney's failure to pay a previously imposed sanction.CitationTWENTIETH CENT v TAK HUNG CHOONG (Second Sanction) 79 CA4 1274 [See: LabC 2802; CCP 904.1, 177.5; Caldwell v Samuels 222 CA3 970; Calhoun v Vallejo USD 20 CA4 39, T/AT 1/94; People v Tabb 228 CA3 1300]
|
|
