|
2643 A public agency's zero-tolerance policy regarding drug use by public employees who drive agency vehicles is neither arbitrary nor capricious; in the absence of specific allegations about how coercion was accomplished, the conclusory claim that an employee was coerced into signing an agreement relating to his termination is not sufficient to justify overruling a demurrer based on the agreement.CitationROBISON v CITY OF MANTECA (Zero Tolerance) 78 CA4 452 [See: Keithley v Civ Svce Bd 11 CA3 443; Constancio v State Personnel Bd 179 CA3 980; Ackerman v State Personnel Bd 145 CA3 395]
|
|
