|
2567 In the absence of prior similar incidents, sexual assault in an underground parking lot was not sufficiently foreseeable to impose on the operator of the parking lot a duty to take any precautions against it, even though a bank in the same building had been robbed 7 times in the previous two years and 72 non-sexual crimes had been committed within the 50 block area surrounding the parking lot in the previous three months.CitationSHARON P v ARMAN (Underground Lot) 21 C4 1181 [See: Ann M v Pacific Plaza 6 C4 666, T/AT 2/94; Gomez v Ticor 145 CA3 622; Cohen v Southland 157 CA3 130; Sharon P v Arman (RevGrtd) AT 8/97]
|
|
