Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2709 A nuisance action based on the claim that railroad employees deliberately caused excessive noise for the purpose of harassing plaintiff is not pre-empted by federal statutes.CitationJONES v UNION PACIFIC (Railroad Noise) 79 CA4 1053 [See: CivC 3482; 49 USC 10501, 4901 etseq, 20101, 4916; US Const I, 8; Rushing v KC Southern 185 F3 496; City of Auburn v US 154 F3 1025] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||